You are now leaving the PIMCO website.

Skip to Main Content
Blog

China’s Property Sector Slump: Is Recovery on the Horizon?

In the absence of immediate and substantive policy easing at the national level, we believe that the sector could pose a serious risk to the government’s GDP growth target in 2022.

For the past two decades, the Chinese property sector’s exponential growth has been a key GDP growth driver for China – until its rise ended abruptly in July 2021 when property sales slumped amid increased government policy tightening.

Compared with the previous year, 2H 2021 figures for residential property were down 15% in terms of transaction volumes, 35% for land sales across 300 cities, and 4% for property investment.

A wave of defaults has hit over-leveraged property developers. Since 2018, at least 30 developers have defaulted or conducted a distressed exchange offer – over 90% occurring in the last six months – with U.S. $82.6 billion total outstanding U.S. dollar-denominated bonds, or 57% of China high yield property sector’s outstanding bonds.

While the Chinese government has made dovish statements about the sector since late 2021 – emphasizing the "healthy development and virtuous cycle” of the industry – there was a lack of concrete follow-up measures at the national level. In our view, property sales will likely remain weak in 1H 2022 and we could see more defaults in the near-term, hence trading in the sector could remain volatile. In the absence of immediate and substantive policy, we believe that the sector could pose a serious risk to the government’s GDP growth target in 2022.

Material easing measures are required at the national level

Since the start of the year, over 100 local governments have announced various easing measures, including lower mortgage rates, lower down payment ratios, partial relaxation of home purchase restrictions (HPR), and even relaunching the Shanty Town Redevelopment program in certain cities. However, so far, we have yet to see any turnaround in market sentiment. The recent resurgence of COVID in China and city lockdowns have further muted the potential impact from local easing.

We believe the central government faces a choice: Implement material policy easing at the national level in the next few months or risk further sector meltdown, both in the physical property and capital markets. If it decides to act, the government must address, in our view, how to stimulate housing demand and how to assist developers in regaining access to refinancing channels.

Key to the former, in our view, is making a universal cut to mortgage rates and in down payment ratios nationally, along with a partial relaxation of HPR in select cities. Improving access to refinancing channels for surviving developers is likely to require the central government to guide onshore banks not to pull back credit, while also reopening the onshore bond market to these developers to avoid any further defaults.

We expect any policy easing to take at least three to six months to translate into a recovery in the physical property market.

The property sector faces both headwinds and tailwinds

Looking ahead, challenges for the sector include weak housing affordability, slower urbanization, high housing ownership, a supply-demand mismatch, and overhang from worries about property tax. However, we believe the offshore USD bond market has largely priced in these challenges.

In our view, several factors could help to stabilize the sector’s long-term development, such as increasing demand from consumers to upgrade housing, low loan-to-value ratios and high household savings rates, the importance of the property sector to China’s economic growth and local governments, abundant liquidity in the system, and limited investment channels in China.

We expect transaction volumes to drop noticeably in the next couple of years, but they should stabilize from 2024 onwards, supported by demand from upgraders as well as first-home buyers. While a sharp correction in property prices is a quick fix to weak housing affordability, a sharp drop in housing value – which accounts for 59% of Chinese net worth – could lead to contraction in consumption. Given the sector is highly regulated by the government, we believe the Chinese government will likely induce a mild and gradual price correction in the coming one to two years. We project that property prices could drop by low to mid-single digit in 2022.

While the sector faces challenges, there is value to be found

We have grouped Chinese high yield real estate companies into three categories: survivors that should be able to weather the current market downturn even amid higher sector volatility; names on the borderline, whose fate largely depends on how soon the government will ease and how effective the policies are; and defaulted/distressed names.

We favor those we identify as survivors – and many of their bonds are trading at double-digit yields. We believe these companies have relatively strong fundamentals and are in the best position to survive or even gain share in the current sector downturn given their relatively better liquidity position and prudent financial management.

For a detailed picture of our outlook for China’s economic growth, please read our recent blog, ‘China Growth Outlook: Counting the Cost of Lockdowns’.



1 Transaction volumes and land sales figures are by Gross Floor Area. Source: PIMCO, WIND. Data as of 21 March 2022.

2 Source: PIMCO as of 21 March 2022.

3 Home purchase restrictions (HPR) aim to squeeze out speculative demand and dampen soaring home prices. Beijing was the first city to implement the HPR in 2010.

Featured Participants

Disclosures

All investments contain risk and may lose value. Investing in foreign-denominated and/or -domiciled securities may involve heightened risk due to currency fluctuations, and economic and political risks, which may be enhanced in emerging markets. Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and low interest rate environments increase this risk. Reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed.

Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision. Outlook and strategies are subject to change without notice.

PIMCO as a general matter provides services to qualified institutions, financial intermediaries and institutional investors. Individual investors should contact their own financial professional to determine the most appropriate investment options for their financial situation. This material contains the opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO is a trademark of Allianz Asset Management of America LLC in the United States and throughout the world. ©2023, PIMCO.

Select Your Location

Americas

Europe, Middle East & Africa