Blog

Fiscal, Not Monetary, to Determine Europe’s Inflation Path Ahead

Strong money growth in Europe has raised concerns about inflation taking off. We have a different view.

It used to be that central banks heavily influenced inflation through tools such as interest rates, money supply and bank reserves. However, in a post-COVID 19 world with interest rates close to their lower bounds, this balance may be shifting, with fiscal policy now a much more important factor driving inflation.

In Europe, unless fiscal policy continues to stimulate when the economy has healed from the COVID-19 shock, we expect inflation to remain weak in the coming years. This is despite a recent surge in money growth – once a good indicator of future inflation. Let’s look at this magnitude in more detail.

Eurozone M3, a money supply measure that includes bank deposits but excludes central bank reserves, has risen sharply in recent months, reaching 10% year-over-year in July, close to the record levels seen before the 2007-08 financial crisis. U.K. money growth has surged too.

This growth has been mainly driven by:

  1. Central banks’ quantitative easing (QE): The European Central Bank (ECB) and the Bank of England (BoE) have bought financial assets, mainly government bonds, replacing them with deposits via the banking system. This has happened as the pool of sovereign bonds on offer has substantially increased: Governments have sold more debt to help finance the new fiscal stimulus plans put in place to counter the effects of COVID-19.
  2. More loans: banks have increased lending, especially to corporates. This, however, is not a normal positive cyclical indicator: Instead of borrowing money to finance new investment projects, firms have borrowed to fund working capital, inventories and for liability management purposes, incentivized by new government and central bank loan-facilitating schemes. The good news is that these programmes have worked.

Not like before

These forces driving money growth are different from the money expansion seen in the lead up to the 2008-09 financial crisis, when M3 rose almost entirely on the back of strong credit creation to households and corporates, as seen in the chart below:

Fig 1: This time is different, in terms of money growth drivers

The pre-financial crisis cycle was fueled by higher private sector demand. Today’s money growth, in contrast, is driven by a combination of fiscal and monetary easing in response to falling private sector demand.

This lower private sector demand is the flip-side of higher savings. Household savings rates in Germany and France, for instance, shot up to new record highs in the second quarter of the year, and we expect them to remain high over the near future, as individuals save for precautionary reasons and firms de-lever their balance sheets.

Looking ahead, money growth will likely remain elevated over the coming quarters, as the ECB and the BoE continue their asset-purchase programmes. However, some of this growth will be offset as companies reduce debt and as some government-guaranteed credit schemes are eventually unwound.

Fiscal more important than monetary for inflation outlook

Given this more subdued private sector demand and higher savings, we expect inflationary pressures to remain weak in Europe in the coming year. Europe’s economy is still far from running at full capacity, something that weighs on prices. Over the medium term, or 2022 and after, we believe the ECB and the BoE alone (both committed to low interest rates), will struggle to lift inflation through asset-purchase programmes, which merely change the composition of assets in private hands, from bonds to deposits.

Given these challenges on central banks’ monetary efforts, we believe fiscal policy is a much more important factor for driving inflation. Unlike monetary policy, which primarily works through interest rates, fiscal policy directly influences aggregate demand through government expenditure and taxation policy. Fiscal deficits also directly increase the amount of assets in private hands -- by first replacing money with bonds, and then recycling the money back to the private sector through lower taxes or higher spending. This capacity may be more effective at lifting inflation – but for this we would need to see the fiscal stimulus programmes continue when the economy returns to full capacity.

However, this is not our base case for now. Although the Eurozone is unlikely to repeat the austerity plans of 2011-14, we believe fiscal policy is unlikely to remain very stimulative after the crisis. In some countries, Italy for example, fiscal capacity is limited, at least to some extent constrained by fiscal limits imposed by the European Commission. Other countries, like Germany, have ample fiscal space, but they are less likely to use it.  And there are question marks whether the U.K., while unlikely to return to austerity, will continue to fiscally expand at full employment.

Investment implications

With inflation set to remain low over the cyclical horizon, duration should remain anchored. If fiscal policy remained expansionary post the COVID-19 recovery, the risk of higher inflation would increase. For now, we think that risk is higher in the U.S., given more fiscal willingness and an accommodative central bank, whose new average inflation mandate should accommodate any future fiscal easing. We therefore favour U.S. inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, over their UK and euro-area counterparts.

The Author

Peder Beck-Friis

Portfolio Manager, Global Macro

View Profile

Latest Insights

Related

Disclosures

Inflation-linked bonds (ILBs) issued by a government are fixed income securities whose principal value is periodically adjusted according to the rate of inflation; ILBs decline in value when real interest rates rise. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are ILBs issued by the U.S. government. Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and low interest rate environments increase this risk. Reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed.

Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision. Outlook and strategies are subject to change without notice.

U.K. Elections: What’s Next for Economy and Markets?
XDismiss Next Article
PIMCO

INTERNATIONAL

[change]

Subscribe
Please input a valid email address.